Attitude, Legislation and Litigation towards Students with Disabilities Essay

Understanding of children and adults with learning disabilities has come full circle unless has a long way to do to fully reach either individual. In the 4th century the great philosopher Aristotle wrote, As to the exposure and reproduction of children, let there be a law that no distorted child shall live (Hardman, Drew, & Egar, 2011) While this seems brutal, for the times it was quite commons. Even contemporary era societal groups like the Nazis in the 1940s had cleansing programs, were thousands of plenty with various disabilities were deemed useless and simply displace to death like dogs and cats. forthwith we as a order try to better understand the trials of passel with disabilites and table service them to succeed in schools. Federal groups like Individuals with disabilities Education toy( conception) and the Americans with Disablilites Act(ADA) cede pushed our thinking and laws to the future. Although there is a lot more that desires to be done we argon moving in the practiced direction. A tragical Beginning As mentioned above there was not just a prejudice and fear that a man hunt for flock who suffered any kind of discernible disability.In ancient Rome and Greece children with disabilities were viewed as signs of weakness and shame. These children were put to death or abandoned, considered a burden on society and humanity. in that location were ancient societies that did not believe in this cultivate but they were not the majority. The 20th century saw an increase in help for students with disabilities but there was a contradiction in the lift to this help. There was blame layd on the p atomic number 18nts for breeding a genetically inferior human and putting the financial burden on the regime for their mistake.Fear of these deficiencies spreading lead to a bulwark on who could embrace and even the sterilization of persons with retardations. In an ease of the sterilization idea tidy sum were being put into hospitals to isolate them from the general public by placing them with their birth kind. In the 1950s more than a million persons in the US had been committed to psychogenic hospitals and institutions. (Hardman, Drew, & Egar, 2011) The First Groups to Fight In the movement of gracious Rights in the 1950s parents of children with disabilities began to push for rights also.In 1949 the United Cerebral paralyse Organization (UCP) and in 1950 the National Association for Retarded Children (NARC) groups were formed to help get accurate information to the public. These organizations wanted to get equal rights for checkup treatment, social services and education for persons with disabilities. It was not until President Kennedy stepped in and became an suggest for these groups that the government began to take these groups serious. He had person investment in these rights with his baby Rosemary suffering from intellectual disabilities.Kennedy said in a vocabulary in 1961,This neglect must endWe must act The subhead above would be used if there are several sections (Hardman, Drew, & Egar, 2011) sound Cases that Pushed reform I n1972 the Wyatt case in Alabama argued that the facilities people with mental retardation were being put into did nothing to prepare them for a place in society and called these places Human Warehouses. These were a series of lawsuits that followed with the moral cost increase of Brown vs. The Board of Education well-be buildd rights law. Halderman vs.Pennhurst State School and Hospital, Youngberg vs. Romeo and homeward Bound vs. Hissom Memorial Center were all influential court cases that brought civil and moral rights of persons with disabilities to the public forum. It was the parental involvement that pushed the government to form groups as advocates for these groups. In 1971 the Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizen (PARC) vs. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania put into light that these children were being denied the right to free and appropriat e public education.It was these groups that quit the education for students with any disability to now get the help they select and deserve. Modern Advocacy Groups The principal(prenominal) groups that come to mind when Disability advocates are mentioned within the educational system are Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). IDEA is officially known as Public Law 94-142 which lays extinct the standards and rules for students from ages 3-21 in public schools. This was originally known as Education for any Handicapped Childrens Act but in 1990 was changed to IDEA.There is restriction for what qualifies as a disability and these are in constant adaption based on what happens in the education system. Without this ability to add or take away ideas it would become stagnant and useless. The ADA lays out what these disabilities are and what they reasonedly and morally have a right to. Challenges facing Educators The of import ch allenge facing educators is a combination for the push of standardized testing, common core standards and federal assistance being based on those scores.The inclusion body of students with disabilities in no different than having a bully or an fundamental introvert in your class and the amount of help that is given has locomote drastically over the last 40 years. The focus in senior high school school is to prepare students to go into the world and succeed as adults and this applies to students with disabilities also. The main fear I have is that in a push to implicate these students we are not helping them to succeed just following legal options.We have come full circle from the days of Aristotle and the Greeks but have a long way to go to get to a draw where we are doing what is best for every student in our delusional system. There is and will probably always be prejudice in society to one group or another but as teachers we need to step forward and praise differences not se parate them. Laws like IDEA and the ADA help parents, schools and teachers have a foundation to build on but it will take more that theory to implement the right actions. The success of these groups and laws are yet to be fully recognized but the potential is there.