A comparison of the magazine articles by John Pilger Essay

A comparison of the magazine expressions by magic Pilger and Tony Parsons, analysing the demeanor they aro drug hatred to several(predicate) audiences and the effect of the voice communication on behaviour and opinion. John Pilgeri s article The Man With No Namei appe bed in the in the raw Statesmeni in June 1991. The magazine is left wing, and aimed at the middle and upper classes of society. I consider that Pilgeri s article is suitable for reader of a broad(prenominal)er intellect, and is entire for the New Statesmeni. The magazine promotes its ideas in such a guidance that whizz ecstasyds to think that it is reliable source of information. Tony Parsonsi article Beggars Of Britainiappeared in Arenai in October 1991. The magazine is aimed at young the great unwashed probably in their teens or twenties. I believe that Parsonsi article is suitable for my own age group, which is of the age 15 to twenty years old. The magazine itself is glossy and full of text and pictur es that work in. It would abide been helpful if the articles provided were in there original form. Graphics are generally very functionful for promoting a idea, in addition to the indite language. Arenai may well provide graphics but since I seduce non agnisen a original copy and nor is there one in my local virginsagents I am unable to discuss the articlei s fully.The New Statesmeni does not have the mode of graphics that is present in Arenai. It is considered as a to a greater extent chunk magazine and depends much less on sensation compared with Arenai. Text for some is difficult to analyse whereas if it is accompanies with illustrations, it delineates the tactile property of the article. diction with gimmicks is fine for all but new statesmen generally promote more depth in thought without the extras. One could compare arena and the new statesman with a reputation that one might either actualise on television or hear on the radio. The television and pictures and illustrations set the scene the scene for the mind to analyse.The radio and the new statesmen just use text. The mind has to provide its own imagery and in some shipway I believe this is better and fairer. The examiner has provided the two articles in contract same font and style. I am not convinced that this makes a fair comparison between the two magazines. We can judge language and readability but possibly not impact on the reader. The tone of two articles is instead face-to-face because in Beggars Of Britaini Tony Parsons uses much offensive personal writing, while John Pilger writes about his personal story. some(prenominal) articles are stimulated in more ways then one.Pilger is emotional in the way he dialogue about his friendship with the stateless person man. Parsons on the separate hand hurls abuse at the way beggars get their money and how they appeal to most peoples sympathetic side. And gypsy beggars who try to stuff a shabby flower into your buttonhole with some sentimental line for the children coos some orotund hag Pilger talks about making a friendship with this stateless man. Parsons shows his personal view on the matter of beggars. Parsonsi article is colloquial because he seems to be talking directly to you with streetwise language. . hey-you-guys-letis-catch-crabs Pilger is somewhat more formal in his approach. I have seen him nodding as if he is in silent discussion with himself Both articles are written in offset printing person. Both articles are addressed directly to the reader. This creates an individual effect, as if the author is writing directly to you. This makes you be more involved in the article, rather the normal news, report the facts and doni t report emotionally. Parsoni s article is written from the writeri s point of view you either agree, or disagree. magic spell Pilger talks about his friendship with a homeless man. Parsonsiarticle was published in Arenai , a magazine aimed at a junior audience and it shows the whole social organization and language is different. Most young people have short care spans but in Parsonsi his article brings up the subject of beggars straight away, with toilsome obscene language making people read the article. been happier for us to respite in a shoebox full of shitThis is effective for young people with short attention spans.As I said earlier in the essay Arenai is aimed at the younger generation. Pilgeri s article was published in New Statesmeni a magazine aimed at middle and upper classes.Pilger writes a touching story of a build up of a birth with a homeless man, The Man With No Namei. Pilger builds up his article with a story and telling the reader the facts. The reader learns about the plight of the homeless people while telling the story of a typical homeless man. My friend is typical in that he bears the familiar scars of the homelessness The article is aimed at the more mature reader, who would be touched by Pilgeri s generous nature, an d the predicament of the homeless man. So this is perfectly in place in the New Statesmeni mature readers to read a mature article. Both articles use Standard English.I regard Beggars of Britain use of English really standard. While The Man With No Name is high Standard English. With but a few complicating words for a teenage reader. such as a furtiveness sporadic, shallow joviality Some of these words are easily complex for an immature reader. The target audience for both publications is perfectly suited in their respective magazines. Parsons writes for a younger audience and writes just how the younger audiences care it. While Pilger writes for a matured audience and the audience like the way it is written. Both article style and structure are catered for different audiences.Pilgeri s article oozes aged style for New Statesmen audience. His story was a touching emotional parable, a parable which makes the reader think otherwise about the subject of homelessness. Parsonsi articl e has a different type of style a more risqui style the younger audience may bulge to show malevolence towards beggars the same type that Parsonsi shares. These people disgusted me Both journalists are highly literate, but I think Parsonsi article does not do him justice. I imagine that Parsonsi article was not written for it high literacy level, but written by Parsonsi passion.His hatred of beggars dictated this article. Pilgeri s article was delicately written and written excellently. The story was written with the right counterbalance of everything fifty- percent story and fifty- percent facts. He had his usual tweed detonating device and was leaning against the hedge This omit from Pilgeri s article is a story paragraph. With maximum publicity, the regimen allocated three hundred million for rough sleepersi This extract from Pilgeri s article is a fact paragraph. Parsonsi article is in general abuse towards beggars, although he does feel genuine sympathy towards the real beggars.In Africa you see beggars with deformed legs crawling, literally crawling Begging defaces the city, degrades the spirit Parsonsi article is mostly just his private opinion on beggars rather then a serious article. Both articles were written in ninety ninety-one. Both and articles were independently published in Arenai and New Statesmani. The conservative government was in business office at the time, and Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister. Both writers were against the conservative government, and blamed the government for homelessness and begging.Thatcher government stopped council spending on housing more then ten years ago. Liberals blame the fall of the begging taboo on the let-the-bloody-orphans-take-care-of-themselves moral philosophy of Thatcherism These articles are still relevant to the year two thousand because both problems are still around. Begging has made a lot of headlines kinda recently because there has been quite a few people who have been falsely beg ging, when they can easily live a prosperous disembodied spirit and have been accused of preying on the British peoplei s generosity.