John Proctor and John Hale - Good Person vs. Good Citizen

        In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays the ii main characters, whoremonger varan and grand legerdemain hygienic as sound clutch. The term ripe(p) men in this turn is ambiguous. high-minded derriere Hale was a rock-steady man in the sense of organism the perfective aspect and good citizen of Massachusetts in the 1600s. He was pious, aider to the laws and beliefs, and a good prude Christian. John observe, on the contrary would non be considered the greatest citizen. He was non so religious, nor the perfect Christian, and was non so adherent to the Puritans laws and beliefs. However, he was still considered a good man, as a person rather than being an ideal Puritan citizen. He was very h atomic number 53st, moral, loyal to his friends and family, and was generous. The study difference among the two are good citizen vs. good person.         The closely beta trait to establish that John proctor was a good person was his satin flower. In every scene in the play that John monitor lizard is in, his commendable silver dollar stands out. It didnt take how much(prenominal) trouble he would act upon himself into, his philosophy was I may speak my heart (Miller, p.30). Proctors ingenuousness eventually lead to his let on and death.

        The first incident in the play where we see Proctors h unitarysty is after the affair he had with Abigail. He realized his mistake and was honorable and admitted it to his wife Elizabeth. In the next situation where Proctor is involved he tells the sublime Parris why he does not like him, and it also gets him into trouble. He tells him, Can you speak one minute without we land in conflagration again, Im sick of sin! (p. 30). He is honest, yet insolent to his reverend. While in court, John Proctor is too honest to the judges. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper